Subscribe

Longer Duration of Response in MOBILITY Study with Sarilumab plus MTX in Patients with Active, Moderate-to-Severe RA

VBCR - December 2017, Vol 6, No 5 - ACR 2017 Conference Correspondent, Rheumatoid Arthritis

The efficacy and safety of sarilu­mab, a human monoclonal antibody blocking the interleukin-6 receptor alpha, were evaluated for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 3 clinical trials, including the MOBILITY trial. The phase 3, 52-week MOBILITY study demonstrated that subcutaneous sarilumab (150 mg or 200 mg every 2 weeks [q2w]) plus methotrexate (MTX) achieved clinical and radiographic efficacy in adults with active, moderate-to-severe RA and inadequate response to MTX. The current analysis examined differences in the mean duration of response in the MOBILITY study based on 5 different definitions of duration of response. The co-primary end points of the MOBILITY trial were proportion of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response at week 24, change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at week 16, and change from baseline in van der Heijde–modified total Sharp score at week 52.

The 5 different definitions of duration of response were: (1) first response to loss of response; (2) longest response; (3) responder weeks; (4) responder weeks percent; and (5) sustained response based on binary analysis (yes/no) of whether the response was maintained until the end of the double-blind period. Duration of response was measured for 20% improvement in ACR improvement criteria (ACR20), improvement in HAQ-DI of ≥0.3 units, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI; ≤2.8), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI; ≤3.3), and Disease Activity Score 28–C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP; <2.6). Patients included in these analyses must have achieved a response at any point during the study and been considered responders. If patients had a missing value or took rescue medication, they were considered nonresponders for those specific visits.

Regardless of response definition used for ACR20, HAQ-DI, and DAS28-CRP, patients who achieved a response at any point with sarilumab 150 mg or 200 mg q2w plus MTX on the MOBILITY trial had significantly longer duration of response compared with those treated with placebo plus MTX. Whereas patients receiving sarilumab (150 mg or 200 mg) achieved numerically larger differences in CDAI and SDAI versus placebo; these differences did not reach a nominal P <.05. Compared with placebo, the number of responder weeks was also greater (nominal P <.0001) for patients who received sarilumab 150-mg and 200-mg treatment for ACR20 (61.0% and 65.0% vs 44.8%, respectively), HAQ-DI improvement (57.8% and 59.7% vs 44.4%, respectively), and DAS28-CRP (44.5% and 49.4% vs 29.4%, respectively). In terms of sustainability of response, significantly more sarilumab-treated patients showed responses by both ACR20 and HAQ-DI, regardless of whether they achieved response at week 12 or 24.

This analysis showed that patients treated with either dose of sarilumab plus MTX achieved longer duration of response versus those treated with placebo plus MTX, regardless of the definition of response used.

Source: Genovese MC, Mangan EK, Kimura T, et al. Duration of response in a phase 3 study of sarilumab plus methotrexate in patients with active, moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(suppl 10). Abstract 2479.

Related Items
Working in Cold Environment Increases Risk for RA
Alice Goodman
VBCR - April 2018, Vol 7, No 1 published on April 17, 2018 in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Treatment with Methotrexate Alone Yields Similar Outcomes to Combination Therapy in Early RA
Alice Goodman
VBCR - April 2018, Vol 7, No 1 published on April 17, 2018 in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Adalimumab Biosimilar Shown to Be Safe and Effective in Patients with RA
Alice Goodman
VBCR - April 2018, Vol 7, No 1 published on April 17, 2018 in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Using Preference Phenotypes to Enhance Communication, Facilitate Treatment Decision-Making, and Personalize Care
Leslie Wyatt
VBCR - April 2018, Vol 7, No 1 published on April 17, 2018 in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Web-Based Smartphone Application Useful for Monitoring Changes in RA Disease Activity
Sophie Granger
VBCR - December 2017, Vol 6, No 5 published on December 19, 2017 in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Upadacitinib Is Effective in Patients with Active RA with Inadequate Response to Conventional Synthetic DMARDs
VBCR - December 2017, Vol 6, No 5 published on December 19, 2017 in ACR 2017 Conference Correspondent, Rheumatoid Arthritis
Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Adalimumab to Sarilumab
VBCR - December 2017, Vol 6, No 5 published on December 19, 2017 in ACR 2017 Conference Correspondent, Rheumatoid Arthritis
No Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with RA Who Newly Initiated Tocilizumab versus Abatacept
VBCR - December 2017, Vol 6, No 5 published on December 19, 2017 in ACR 2017 Conference Correspondent, Rheumatoid Arthritis
Cost per Effectively Treated Patient with Sarilumab for Active, Moderate-to-Severe RA
VBCR - December 2017, Vol 6, No 5 published on December 19, 2017 in ACR 2017 Conference Correspondent, Rheumatoid Arthritis
Sustained Response Following Discontinuation of MTX in Subcutaneous Tocilizumab-Treated Patients with RA
VBCR - December 2017, Vol 6, No 5 published on December 19, 2017 in ACR 2017 Conference Correspondent, Rheumatoid Arthritis
Last modified: January 15, 2018
  • Rheumatology Practice Management
  • Lynx CME
  • American Health & Drug Benefits
  • Value-Based Cancer Care
  • Value-Based Care in Myeloma
  • Value-Based Care in Neurology